The Suśruta Project

The textual and cultural history of medicine in South Asia based on newly-discovered manuscript evidence

Menu
  • Home
  • Project Overview
    • The Project
  • Project Team
    • Principal Investigator
    • Project collaborators*
    • Research fellows
    • Research Assistants
    • Project associates
  • The Toolbox
    • Prosopography, Manuscripts, e-Texts
    • Transcription, collating, editing
    • Palaeography
    • Tools and Methods
    • Plant databases
  • Bibliographies
    • Selected editions of the Suśrutasaṃhitā
    • Suśruta-related publications by project participants
    • Further selected Suśruta research
  • The Laboratory
    • The evolving new edition (updated weekly)
    • The evolving new translation (updated weekly)
    • Github
    • Working Methods
    • Project management (team members only)
  • Project Outputs
  • Training
    • Training in Digital Humanities
    • Training in Indology and philology
Menu

Candraṭa’s editing of the Suśrutasaṃhitā

Posted on September 12, 2024March 3, 2025 by Dominik Wujastyk

Candraṭa was a Sanskrit author on medical topics who lived in the period 900-1050 CE . He is perhaps best known for writing a commentary on his father Tīsaṭa’s treatise, Cikitsākalikā. But Candraṭa wrote several other works, and of most relevance to our project is his “Editorial Corrections to the Suśruta text” (Suśrutapāṭhaśuddhi). Candraṭa himself said that he wrote this work, in a verse included at the end of his commentary on the Cikitsākalikā:

cikitsākalikāṭīkāṃ yogaratnasamuccayam/
suśrute pāṭhaśuddhiṃ ca tritayaṃ candraṭo vyadhat//


“I created the following three works: the commentary on the Cikitsākalikā, the Yogaratnasamuccaya and the Suśrutapāṭhaśuddhi (`Correction of the Text of the Suśruta’).”

— MS Oxford Bodleian Library Fraser 21 (Aufrecht 1864: 358, entry no. 852), dated 1530 CE.

An authorial statement is also found in some colophons of the Suśrutapāṭhaśuddhi itself, as is shown on f. 59 of MS London IOLR Taylor 1842 (Eggeling catalogue no. 2646):

[corrected transcription:] sauśrute caṃdraṭeneha bhiṣakṭīsaṭasūnunā /
pāṭhaśuddhiḥ kṛtā taṃtre ṭīkām ālokya jaijjaṭīṃ //

“The correction of readings (pāṭhaśuddhi) in the treatise of Suśruta was done by Candraṭa the son of the doctor Tīsaṭa, after studying the commentary of Jejjaṭa.”

Another MS that has the same statement is MS Bikaner Anup 4391 (Kunhan Raja Catalogue p. 337):

In an undated manuscript of the Suśrutasaṃhitā, śārīrasthāna, from Kurukṣetra, we find the same text in a section colophon, but in a slightly expanded form:

sūtrasthānaṃ nidānena śārīreṇa samanvitaṃ /
samāptaṃ vai turīyaṃ te vakṣyāmy atra cikitsitaṃ //
sauśrute caṃdraṭeneha bhiṣakṭīsaṭasūnunā /
pāṭhaśuddhiḥ kṛtā taṃtre ṭīkām ālokya jaijjaṭīṃ // ḥ // śrīḥ//

“The sūtrasthāna has been completed, with the nidāna and śārīra sthānas, and I will explain the fourth, the cikitsāsthāna. The Correction of Readings (pāṭhaśuddhi) in the treatise of Suśruta was done by Candraṭa the son of the doctor Tīsaṭa, after studying the commentary of Jejjaṭa.”

— MS Kurukṣetra Jawaharlal Nehru Library 19786, f. 78v

The Kurukṣetra colophon above has the extra initial statement, “I will explain (vakṣyāmi).” It is not clear whose voice this is. Is it the scribe? But vakṣyāmi is normally an authorial expression, where a scribe would be more likely to say something like likhyate mayā. The second statement, which is the same as that of the London MS, is more straightforward: Candraṭa wrote The Correction of Readings. This sounds like a statement by Candraṭa himself. However, this raises the question of why the statement appears at the end of the Kurukṣetra manuscript, which contains only the Suśrutasaṃhitā, and does not include Candraṭa’s work. However, it is definitely of interest that the scribe of the Kurukṣetra manuscript was aware of Candraṭa’s work and thought of it as a relevant reference to raise in the context of a manuscript of the Suśrutasaṃhitā. This means that several centuries after Candraṭa, the Suśrutasaṃhitā was thought of as a work that he had corrected.

Bibliography

{2579494:N9ANTLPZ} chicago-author-date default asc 0 1498

Recent Blog Posts

  • AI-generated promotional video
  • Graph of frequency / time of dated SS manuscripts
  • Intertextuality and the Methods of Diagnosis
  • All Blog Posts in One PDF
  • Podcast on the Kalpasthāna

Categories

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • February 2025
  • December 2024
  • September 2024
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • April 2020

The Suśruta Project is funded as a four-year Insight Grant by the Canadian Social Sciences and Humanites Research Council. Grant no. 435-2020-1077.  Dates: 1 April 2020 - 31 March 2024. Applicaton DOI.

Supplementary funding is provided for the project from the Singhmar Chair Endowment Grant administered by the University of Alberta.

This website and all files created by this project are copyrighted by Dominik Wujastyk and the Suśruta Project and distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

University of Alberta

University of Alberta
©2025 The Suśruta Project | Theme by SuperbThemes