The Suśruta Project

The textual and cultural history of medicine in South Asia based on newly-discovered manuscript evidence

Menu
  • Home
  • Project overview
  • Project Team
    • Principal Investigator
    • Project collaborators*
    • Research fellows
  • The Toolbox
    • Prosopography
    • Related projects
    • Textual criticism
    • Bibliographies
      • Selected editions of the Suśrutasaṃhitā
      • Suśruta-related publications by project participants
      • Further selected Suśruta research
  • The Laboratory
    • The evolving new edition
    • Github
    • Working Methods
Menu

Who was Bhoja?

Posted on January 6, 2021January 6, 2021 by Dominik Wujastyk

The Nepalese manuscripts of the Suśrutasaṃhitā include Bhoja as one of the great, ancient authorities of Ayuveda. The recent post by Jason Birch discusses this point. In this post I would like to give some information about this figure in medical history. The remarks below are based on the research of Meulenbeld .

Date

First, this authority is nothing to do with the famous eleventh-century Paramāra king, Bhoja of Dhārā. The Bhoja of the Suśrutasaṃhitā obviously preceded the physical manuscript Kathmandu KL 699, dated 878 CE, that mentions the name. But it is likely that this Bhoja may be datable to an earlier period still, when the text of the Suśrutasaṃhitā was being compiled. Since the text was compiled over a long period and in several discrete steps, it is hard to be more precise about the date. Bhoja preceded the commentators Jejjaṭa (c. 650 – c. 750), Indu and Tīsaṭa (fl. c. 900-1000), who quote him, and Meulenbeld lists almost fifty later authors who also cite or refer to Bhoja’s work.

Work

The ancient medical author Bhoja composed a work of his own that may have been similar to the Suśrutasaṃhitā and possibly even one of its sources. Bhoja’s work is widely quoted by later authors including, especially, the learned commentators Cakrapāṇidatta (fl. c. 1075) and Ḍalhaṇa (b. 1150). It is sometimes referred to as a saṃhitā, or as a tantra and according to the Vāgbhaṭamaṇḍana it was divided into the same sthānas as the Suśrutasaṃhitā The quotations from it suggest that it was written in verse mixed with prose and may have been in the form of a dialogue between a teacher and a king (like the Suśrutasaṃhitā). The quotations also suggest that Bhoja’s text included material on śalya and śālākya as well as general Ayurvedic topics. There may have existed different versions of Bhoja’s treatise, since shorter and longer versions (bṛhad-, vṛddha-, mahā-, kṣudra-) are referred to.

Bhoja’s work is referred to as late as the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries by Muslim medical authors in India, for example in the Ma‘dan al-shifa’-i Sikandar-shahi and the Ganj-i bad-awurd .

Finally, the name Bhoja referring to a medical authority is also known from Buddhist sources, where however he is characterized as a specialist in toxicology and the treatment of snakebite.

References

{2579494:N9ANTLPZ};{2579494:9AG6NGGJ} default asc no 484
Meulenbeld, Gerrit Jan. 1999. A History of Indian Medical Literature. 5 vols. Groningen: E. Forsten.
Speziale, Fabrizio. 2011. “The Circulation of Ayurvedic Knowledge in Indo-Persian Medical Literature.” In . Leiden, Netherlands. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00584749.

Recent Blog Posts

  • Fragments of a lost manuscript
  • Who was Bhoja?
  • Ḍalhaṇa and the Early ‘Nepalese’ Version of the Suśrutasaṃhitā
  • An anusvāra and the goals of editing
  • An unknown early commentary on the Suśrutasaṃhitā

Categories

Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • April 2020

Login

The Suśruta Project is funded as a four-year Insight Grant by the Canadian Socal Sciences and Humanites Research Council. Grant no. 435-2020-1077.  Dates: 1 April 2020 – 31 March 2024. Applicaton DOI.

Supplementary funding is provided for the project from the Singhmar Chair Endowment Grant administered by the University of Alberta.

©2021 The Suśruta Project | Theme by SuperbThemes